Monday, July 20, 2009


The Merger of Calvinism with Worldliness
from Sword & Trowel 2009, No. 1 by Dr Peter Masters

When I was a youngster and newly saved, it seemed as if the chief goal of all zealous Christians, whether Calvinistic or Arminian, was consecration. Sermons, books and conferences stressed this in the spirit of Romans 12.1-2, where the beseeching apostle calls believers to present their bodies a living sacrifice, and not to be conformed to this world. The heart was challenged and stirred. Christ was to be Lord of one’s life, and self must be surrendered on the altar of service for him.

But now, it appears, there is a new Calvinism, with new Calvinists, which has swept the old objectives aside. A recent book, Young, Restless, Reformed, by Collin Hansen tells the story of how a so-called Calvinistic resurgence has captured the imaginations of thousands of young people in the USA, and this book has been reviewed with great enthusiasm in well-known magazines in the UK, such as Banner of Truth, Evangelical Times, and Reformation Today.

This writer, however, was very deeply saddened to read it, because it describes a seriously distorted Calvinism falling far, far short of an authentic life of obedience to a sovereign God. If this kind of Calvinism prospers, then genuine biblical piety will be under attack as never before.

The author of the book is a young man (around 26 when he wrote it) who grew up in a Christian family and trained in secular journalism. We are indebted to him for the readable and wide-reaching survey he gives of this new phenomenon, but the scene is certainly not a happy one.

The author begins by describing the Passion, conference at Atlanta in 2007, where 21,000 young people revelled in contemporary music, and listened to speakers such as John Piper proclaiming Calvinistic sentiments. And this picture is repeated many times through the book – large conferences being described at which the syncretism of worldly, sensation-stirring, high-decibel, rhythmic music, is mixed with Calvinistic doctrine.

We are told of thunderous music, thousands of raised hands, ‘Christian’ hip-hop and rap lyrics (the examples seeming inept and awkward in construction) uniting the doctrines of grace with the immoral drug-induced musical forms of worldly culture.

Collin Hansen contends that American Calvinism collapsed at the end of the nineteenth century and was maintained by only a handful of people until this great youth revival, but his historical scenario is, frankly, preposterous. As one who regularly visited American seminaries to speak from the early 1970s, I constantly met many preachers and students who loved the doctrines of grace, preaching also in churches of solid Calvinistic persuasion. But firmer evidence of the extensive presence of Calvinism is seen from the fact that very large firms of publishers sent out a stream of reformed literature post-war and through the 1980s. The mighty Eerdmans was solidly reformed in times past, not to mention Baker Book House, and Kregel and others. Where did all these books go – thousands upon thousands of them, including frequently reprinted sets of Calvin’s commentaries and a host of other classic works?

In the 1970s and 80s there were also smaller Calvinistic publishers in the USA, and at that time the phenomenon of Calvinistic discount Christian bookshops began, with bulging catalogue lists and a considerable following. The claim that Calvinism virtually disappeared is hopelessly mistaken.

Indeed, a far better quality Calvinism still flourishes in very many churches, where souls are won and lives sanctified, and where Truth and practice are both under the rule of Scripture. Such churches have no sympathy at all with reporter Collin Hansen’s worldly-worship variety, who seek to build churches using exactly the same entertainment methods as most charismatics and the Arminian Calvary Chapel movement.

The new Calvinists constantly extol the Puritans, but they do not want to worship or live as they did. One of the vaunted new conferences is called Resolved, after Jonathan Edwards’ famous youthful Resolutions (seventy searching undertakings). But the culture of this conference would unquestionably have met with the outright condemnation of that great theologian.

Resolved is the brainchild of a member of Dr John MacArthur’s pastoral staff, gathering thousands of young people annually, and featuring the usual mix of Calvinism and extreme charismatic-style worship. Young people are encouraged to feel the very same sensational nervous impact of loud rhythmic music on the body that they would experience in a large, worldly pop concert, complete with replicated lighting and atmosphere. At the same time they reflect on predestination and election. Worldly culture provides the bodily, emotional feelings, into which Christian thoughts are infused and floated. Biblical sentiments are harnessed to carnal entertainment. (Pictures of this conference on their website betray the totally worldly, showbusiness atmosphere created by the organisers.)

In times of disobedience the Jews of old syncretised by going to the Temple or the synagogue on the sabbath, and to idol temples on weekdays, but the new Calvinism has found a way of uniting spiritually incompatible things at the same time, in the same meeting.

C J Mahaney is a preacher highly applauded in this book. Charismatic in belief and practice, he appears to be wholly accepted by the other big names who feature at the ‘new Calvinist’ conferences, such as John Piper, John MacArthur, Mark Dever, and Al Mohler. Evidently an extremely personable, friendly man, C J Mahaney is the founder of a group of churches blending Calvinism with charismatic ideas, and is reputed to have influenced many Calvinists to throw aside cessationist views.

It was a protégé of this preacher named Joshua Harris who started the New Attitude conference for young people. We learn that when a secular rapper named Curtis Allen was converted, his new-born Christian instinct led him to give up his past life and his singing style. But Pastor Joshua Harris evidently persuaded him not to, so that he could sing for the Lord. New Calvinists do not hesitate to override the instinctual Christian conscience, counselling people to become friends of the world.

One of the mega-churches admired in the book is the six-thousand strong Mars Hill Church at Seattle, founded and pastored by Mark Driscoll, who blends emerging church ideas (that Christians should utilise worldly culture) with Calvinistic theology [see endnote 1].

This preacher is also much admired by some reformed men in the UK, but his church has been described (by a sympathiser) as having the most ear-splitting music of any, and he has been rebuked by other preachers for the use of very ‘edgy’ language and gravely improper humour (even on television). He is to be seen in videos preaching in a Jesus teeshirt, symbolising the new compromise with culture, while at the same time propounding Calvinistic teaching. So much for the embracing of Puritan doctrine divested of Puritan lifestyle and worship.

Most of the well-known preachers who promote and encourage this ‘revival’ of Calvinism have in common the following positions that contradict a genuine Calvinistic (or Puritan) outlook:

1. They have no problem with contemporary charismatic-ethos worship, including extreme, heavy-metal forms.

2. They are soft on separation from worldliness [see endnote 2].

3. They reject the concern for the personal guidance of God in the major decisions of Christians (true sovereignty), thereby striking a death-blow to wholehearted consecration.

4. They hold anti-fourth-commandment views, taking a low view of the Lord’s Day, and so inflicting another blow at a consecrated lifestyle.

Whatever their strengths and achievements (and some of them are brilliant men by any human standard), or whatever their theoretical Calvinism, the poor stand of these preachers on these crucial issues will only encourage a fatally flawed version of Calvinism that will lead people to be increasingly wedded to the world, and to a self-seeking lifestyle.

Truly proclaimed, the sovereignty of God must include consecration, reverence, sincere obedience to his will, and separation from the world.

You cannot have Puritan soteriology without Puritan sanctification. You should not entice people to Calvinistic (or any) preaching by using worldly bait. We hope that young people in this movement will grasp the implications of the doctrines better than their teachers, and come away from the compromises. But there is a looming disaster in promoting this new form of Calvinism.

Why do some British Christians who hold the doctrines of grace give enthusiastic reviews to a book like this? There have been times in the past when large numbers of young people have suddenly become intellectually enthusiastic about solid Christian doctrine, only to abandon it almost as quickly. One thinks of the tremendous response the unique oratory of Francis Schaeffer secured on university campuses in the 1960s, and no doubt some young people were truly saved and established, but very many more turned aside. Gripped by the superiority of a biblical worldview, they momentarily despised the illogical, flaccid ideas of this world, but the impression in numerous cases was natural rather than spiritual. The present new, heady Calvinism, shorn of practical obedience will certainly prove to be ephemeral, leaving the cause compromised and scarred.

Has this form of Calvinism come to Britain yet? Alas, yes; one only has to look at the ‘blogs’ of some younger reformed pastors who put themselves forward as mentors and advisers of others. When you look at their ‘favourite films’, and ‘favourite music’ you find them unashamedly naming the leading groups, tracks and entertainment of debased culture, and it is clear that the world is still in their hearts. Years ago, such brethren would not have been baptised until they were clear of the world, but now you can go to seminary, no questions asked, and take up a pastorate, with unfought and unsurrendered idols in the throne room of your life. What hope is there for churches that have under-shepherds whose loyalties are so divided and distorted?

Aside from pastors, we know some ‘new’ young Calvinists who will never settle in a dedicated, working church, because their views live only in their heads and not their hearts. We know of some whose lives are not clean. We know of others who go clubbing. The greater their doctrinal prowess, the greater their hypocrisy.

These are harsh words, but they lead me to say that where biblical, evangelical Calvinism shapes conduct, and especially worship, it is a very humbling, beautiful system of Truth, but where it is confined to the head, it inflates pride and self-determination.

The new Calvinism is not a resurgence but an entirely novel formula which strips the doctrine of its historic practice, and unites it with the world.

Why have the leading preachers servicing this movement compromised so readily? They have not been threatened by a Soviet regime. No one has held a gun to their heads. This is a shameful capitulation, and we must earnestly pray that what they have encouraged will not take over Calvinism and ruin a generation of reachable Christian young people.

A final sad spectacle reported with enthusiasm in the book is the Together for the Gospel conference, running from 2006. A more adult affair convened by respected Calvinists, this nevertheless brings together cessationists and non-cessationists, traditional and contemporary worship exponents, and while maintaining sound preaching, it conditions all who attend to relax on these controversial matters, and learn to accept every point of view. In other words, the ministry of warning is killed off, so that every -error of the new scene may race ahead unchecked. These are tragic days for authentic spiritual faithfulness, worship and piety.

True Calvinism and worldliness are opposites. Preparation of heart is needed if we would search the wonders and plumb the depths of sovereign grace. We find it in the challenging, convicting call of Joshua:

‘Now therefore fear the Lord, and serve him in sincerity and in truth: and put away the gods which your fathers served on the other side of the flood, and in Egypt; and serve ye the Lord. And if it seem evil unto you to serve the Lord, choose you this day whom ye will serve; whether the gods which your fathers served that were on the other side of the flood, or the gods of the Amorites, in whose land ye dwell: but as for me and my house, we will serve the Lord.’

Endnotes

1 His resolution of the question of divine sovereignty versus human free will, however, is much nearer to the Arminian view.

2 A recent book entitled Worldliness: Resisting the Seduction of a Fallen World by C J Mahaney and others, hopelessly under-equips young believers for separation from the world, especially in the area of music, where, apparently, the Lord loves every genre, and acceptability is reduced to two misleading and subjective questions.

Sunday, July 19, 2009

The Calvary Road


By Pastor Tod Brainard

There has been a resurgence of interest in a short book entitled The Calvary Road
written in 1950 (reprinted in 2004) by Roy Hession. Hession borrowed much from
Keswick teachings of the late 19 th and early 20th centuries to write his booklet. In it he
expressed his beliefs in a "deeper experience of the Lord Jesus" or "victorious life". A
little history is in order. With the release of Hession’s book in 1950, copies made their
way to Far Eastern Asia where missionaries began to digest the book. After a few
months, several missionaries were teaching the book to their people and special prayer
meetings were initiated for the purpose of .emptying self of all known sin, a key
principle in Hession’s book. Several missionaries went into bouts of depression
because of failure to receive the .victorious life. That would be the sign of the filling of
their lives with the Holy Spirit. There was confusion and divisions that arose as some
claimed to have received "the second blessing" while others had not yet reached the
plateau. Hession taught that the Christian was capable of eradicating all known sin
through confession and repentance. In other words, it was possible to reach a certain
measure of spiritual perfection, a level very close to the eradication of the sin nature. He
believed that the Christian must constantly empty himself of self and all known sin
before he could be filled with the Spirit to be victorious. Still further, Hession taught that
a Christian could lose his salvation and in order to be saved again, must reapply the
blood of Christ. to once again be restored to faith in Jesus Christ. His theology was not
original for Pelagius, Arminius, John Wesley, the Keswick movement, the Salvation
Army and Pentecostalism have all believed and taught this false doctrine.

The late missionary, Dr. Gerald Johnson, related this account to our founding editor,
Dr. Dayton Hobbs, concerning what took place in Japan and Southeast Asia in the early
1950’s with the arrival of .The Calvary Road. theology or Hessionism. In 1952, Dr. Bob
Jones, Sr. received word of what was happening on the mission fields of Japan and
Southeast Asia with this wave of .second blessing theology and he traveled to East Asia
to meet with the Bob Jones graduates who were serving as missionaries there. As a
former Methodist, Dr. Bob Jones, Sr. understood this second blessing doctrine well and
was greatly opposed to it. When he arrived he told the missionaries that what they were
teaching and practicing from Roy Hession’s book amounted to heresy. He warned
those who had been ordained through Gospel Fellowship Association that any who
continued with the heresy of Hession would be removed from the association. Because
of Dr. Bob Jones, Sr.’s great act of courage, the heresy that had spread among
Fundamental missionaries was extinguished. In the preface to the 1973 edition of
The Calvary Road, Hession wrote that through revival, believers are coming to
experience ....the blood of the Lamb... to cleanse us from all sin.... Hession had an
infatuation with the blood of Christ that went beyond the bounds of Scripture.
Hession referred to his understanding as .the disposition in the Blood. (Pages 29,30).
The blood of Christ is indeed the foundational truth of the forgiveness of sin provided
by Christ. However, Ephesians 5:25-27 is very clear that sanctification is carried forth in
the believer’s life through the .washing of the water by the word.. The daily cleansing of
sin in the believer.s life is handled through the washing of the Word of God, thereby
walking in the Light (which is a synonym for the Word of God) and confession of
sin ( I John 1:7-9). His understanding of .the disposition in the Blood implies several
things: 1) it implies that the blood of Christ only covers sin insofar as the believer
confesses all known sin; 2) it implies that any unconfessed sin is not covered by Jesus’
blood sacrifice and therefore must be exposed and identified; 3) it implies that revival
is an experience equal to a second work of grace beyond initial salvation as the believer
comes to experience the power of the blood to reach us in cleansing power
(page 31). In other words, the blood is limited in its efficacious work for it can only reach
us as individuals confess every sin In addition, in his preface to the 1973 edition,
Hession references Psalm 102:13 and Nehemiah 2:13 (very little Scripture is used by
Hession to back his beliefs) in relation to revival and his vision for the Church. These
verses obviously pertain to Israel, yet Hession applies them to the Church.

Brokenness

In Chapter One it is clear that Hession does not understand true conversion. He sees
salvation and sanctification as two separate acts. Furthermore, he does not understand
positional sanctification and practical sanctification. Positionally, the believer is HOLY,
hidden with Christ in God,. (Colossians 3:3). But the Christian still has the old sin
nature including self-will. This sin nature will continue in the body until death. We cannot
empty the old nature. What Hession does not understand is that Christian perfection is
not perfection of conduct. Rather, Christian perfection is a perfect relationship
between man and God, perfection of motive and love (I Cor. 10:31; I John 4:17,18; Matt.
22:37-40; I Cor. 13). Enoch "walked with God". Whether Enoch’s relationship with God
was perfect or not was known only to God. Others saw its fruit in Enoch’s life, but the
fruit did not convince others of his perfection of relationship with God, for man judges
the outward appearance and finds imperfection. Yet Enoch walked with God right into
heaven without dying. Hession seems to believe that one cannot walk in newness of life
unless we are continually confessing and emptying ourselves of self. his definition of
brokenness.. Now, do not misunderstand me, the Christian is to confess sin to God.
God is faithful and just to forgive us of our sins and to cleanse us from all
unrighteousness. The problem is that Hession and the Keswick teachers of his day
taught that we maintain brokenness by emptying ourselves of self through
continued confession. While it is true that we are indeed selfish and willful, does the
New Testament teach us to empty ourselves of self? If by self, Hession is referring
to the "flesh" he is not preaching a Biblical concept. The flesh is corrupt. We cannot fix
the flesh nor can we empty ourselves of the flesh. Romans teaches in Chapter 6:6,
"Knowing this, that our old self was crucified with Him, in order that our body of
sin might be done away with, so that we would no longer be slaves to sin" (NASV).
We, therefore, are "to reckon ourselves (the flesh, self) to be dead indeed
unto sin and alive unto God through Jesus Christ our Lord. Therefore do not
let sin reign in your mortal body so that you obey the lusts thereof" (Romans 6:11-
12).
There is no teaching of sin eradication, but rather crucifixion of the flesh and sin’s
removal from power (the reign of sin) in our mortal bodies. He breaks the power of
canceled sin, He sets the prisoner free,. as the hymn says. There is indeed a big
difference in that understanding. "For sin shall not be master over you, for you are
not under law but under grace" (Romans 6:14). We are no longer slaves to sin, but
slaves to righteousness (Romans 6:16-18). The error of Hession is the same error upon
which Methodism, the Holiness movement, and the Salvation Army was founded in the
19 th century. The promises related to contrition and brokenness are linked to salvation,
not a "second blessing" - "the Lord... saveth such as be of a contrite spirit" (Psalm
34:18). To apply this to some additional work of revival and appearance of a "second
blessing" is to rewrite Scripture to fit a human belief system, not a Biblical system. For
excellent studies on the doctrine of sanctification (holiness) and the false doctrine of
the "second blessing" read Holiness: The False and the True by H.A. Ironside and The
Doctrine of Holiness in These Times by Chester Tulga. 21st Century Hessionism
Hessionism is the profound belief that daily brokenness (emptying of self the flesh and
all known sin in order to obtain or gain something in return) is the secret to revival and
the "victorious life" and that sanctification cannot come unless we live out a daily
emptying of the flesh and all known sin. Yet, we read in Galatians 2:20, "I am crucified
with Christ: nevertheless I live; yet not I, but Christ liveth in me: and the life which
I now live in the flesh I live by the faith of the Son of God, who loved me, and gave
himself for me". As Paul says, we are to "reckon (lit. continually consider)
yourselves to be dead indeed unto sin, but ALIVE unto GOD through Jesus
Christ our Lord" (Romans 6:11). Paul did not say we are to be broken everyday, he
says we are to continually consider
1 ourselves to be two things: 1) DEAD indeed to
the reign and rule of sin, but 2) ALIVE UNTO GOD. Hessionism also accepts a new
definition of GRACE; it calls it REVIVAL. How did the early Christians miss this
definition? How did Grace, God’s favor against human merit, become revival, with
no context of revival being given? The grace of God that bringeth salvation hath
appeared to all men. (Titus 2:11). The grace of God is the way God saves and
sustains us. There is absolutely no excuse for any Christian to live a life of defeat and
failure for,..."where sin abounded, grace [not revival] did much more abound"
(Romans 5:20). Paul warns the believer in II Corinthians 6:1-10 that the Christian not
receive "the grace of God in vain". In otherwords, God supplies His grace in the day of
your salvation (vs.2) and continues to supply His grace in Christian living (vs. 4-10).

Grace is certainly exhibited in revival but the two words are not synonymous. One
Fundamentalist evangelist recently wrote in an article on Brokenness
2, that James
4:6 and I Peter 5:5 mean the following: God resisteth the proud [the unbroken], but
giveth grace [revival] unto the humble [the broken]. This translation of Grace is
saying something that is not in the text. Grace is nowhere in the Scriptures the very
same as revival. Grace, God’s favor against man’s merit, is manifested every
moment of every day to the child of God. Revival may or may not be manifested for it is
the sovereign work of God. In addition, God does not give revival to unregenerate
sinners; He gives ETERNAL LIFE on the basis of His righteousness (Romans 5:15-17).
Revival assumes ETERNAL LIFE, not DEATH. You cannot revive that which is dead.
You can only give resurrection life to that which is dead. Hession admits this in the
preface to his 1950 edition
3 , however, he ironically presents a differing conclusion in his
explanation of revival when he says, Revival is just the life of the Lord Jesus poured out
into human hearts.
4 Is that not what happens at the moment of salvation (John 3:16-18;
36)? Hession continues, "Jesus is pictured as bearing the golden water pot with the
Water of Life. As He passes by, He looks into our cup and if it is clean, He fills to
overflowing with the Water of Life".
5 Have we not eternal life at the moment of salvation?
How can we have more water of life one day and less water of life the next based
on whether we are clean or not? Hession is confused doctrinally. What we need is
Christ’s daily bestowing of His Grace to live the Christian life. Eternal life is not
something we run out of over time that has to be filled up. We either have it or we do
not!

Truth Versus Error

Salvation is brought about by the Baptism of the Holy Spirit (one event), the new birth.
You get as much of the Holy Spirit of God in the new birth as you will ever receive.
He does not come in pieces and in parts. Being filled with the Holy Spirit simply means
submitting to the Spirit of God given at the new birth and His coming to have greater
control of you in every part of your being (Ephesians 5:18). Hessionism, as in its
original release in the late 1940’s and early 1950’s, leads to unprofitable fleshly
introspection, externalism (perfection of conduct – changed exterior with a corrupt
interior), and false claims of reaching a higher plane of spiritual life. The folks, especially
young people, who get wrapped up in this line of thinking usually conform outwardly
for a period of time only to break away to proceed into the depths of iniquity and sin.
Spiritual, as well as physical, depression has often followed this doctrine when it has
reared its sanctimonious head. This is not what God would have for us. May God help
us to follow the Bible and not men’s fleshly ideas about the Bible.


Footnotes
1 Fritz Rienecker/Cleon Rogers, Linguistic Key to the Greek New Testament; Zondervan
Publishing House; (Grand Rapids, MI: 1980); p. 361 . 362; logizesthe - present middle
indicative of reckon, to consider, to figure, to count. The present imperative could mean
.do this continually, .or .continue doing this. 2 John Van Gelderen, Revival Magazine,
2008 Issue II, p. 15. 3 Roy and Revel Hession, The Calvary Road, Christian Literature
Crusade, (Fort Washington, PA: 1950), pgs. 4-5. 4 Hession, see Chapter 1 on
Brokenness, particularly pg 5 and 6. 5 Hession, pg. 7. Ω (Continued from page 9 - The Calvary Road)
am too busy serving Jesus to spend my time and energy engaging in contemporary dialogue.
I think I know what .contemporary dialogue. means. It means that all of those intellectual preachers
are busy reading the news magazines so they will be able to comment on the world situation from
their pulpits on Sunday mornings. But that is not what God called me to do. He called me to preach
the gl o r i e s of Ch r i s t . He commissioned me to tell my people there is a kingdom of God and a
throne in the heavens. And that we have One of our own representing us there. That is what the early
church was excited about. And I think our Lord may have reason to ask why we are no longer very
excited about it. The Christian church in the first century was ablaze with this concept of the risen and
victorious Christ exalted at the right hand of the Father. Although it worshiped no other man, it urged
the worship of this glorified and exalted Man as God, because He had always been the eternal
Son, the second Person of the Godhead. -Excerpt from Jesus, Our Man in Glory by A.W. Tozer;
compiled and edited by Gerald B. Smith, Christian Publications, 1987, pp.4-6. Ω